OUP user menu


Darren Dahl (Editor in Chief)Eileen FischerGita JoharVicki Morwitz

18 out of 120

Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis

Xinshu Zhao, John G. Lynch Jr., Qimei Chen
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/651257 197-206 First published online: 1 August 2010


Baron and Kenny’s procedure for determining if an independent variable affects a dependent variable through some mediator is so well known that it is used by authors and requested by reviewers almost reflexively. Many research projects have been terminated early in a research program or later in the review process because the data did not conform to Baron and Kenny’s criteria, impeding theoretical development. While the technical literature has disputed some of Baron and Kenny’s tests, this literature has not diffused to practicing researchers. We present a nontechnical summary of the flaws in the Baron and Kenny logic, some of which have not been previously noted. We provide a decision tree and a step-by-step procedure for testing mediation, classifying its type, and interpreting the implications of findings for theory building and future research.

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Sign in as a personal subscriber

Log in through your institution

Purchase a personal subscription